March 2007 Archives

March 31, 2007

Stacking the deck

| 11 Comments | No TrackBacks

I'd been trying to work up sufficient outrage to do a post on the fiasco that is the recent plebiscite on the Canadian Wheat Board. Now I don't have to. A columnist at the Regina Leader-Post hits all the high points in one article and concludes:

Whatever one thinks about the Canadian Wheat Board, the tactics employed by the Conservative government during its year-long battle with the CWB are reprehensible, undemocratic and possibly illegal.

All Canadians should be concerned about the depths to which the Conservatives will sink in order to sink the Canadian Wheat Board.


Pretty much. Hat-tip to Buckdog for the link.

All Canadians should be concerned that when Harper and his minions know full well that their policies don't have the support of the majority of Canadians, they'll fix the game if they can get away with it.

Now watch what happens on the subject of electoral reform.

Bookmark and Share

March 30, 2007

The song is Walkin' Blues. The bonus is that this clip with Eric Clapton includes Alberta.

Paul Butterfield did a slightly more intense version. If you had your volume way up for that last one, be ready to dial it back a bit.



Bookmark and Share

March 29, 2007

Dumb and dumber

| 15 Comments | No TrackBacks

In reaction to a certain blogger's rumour-mongering (among other things), there's a new hit-site up. And right smack in the middle of the charges against said blogger is — wait for it — an unsourced, unsubstantiated rumour. Morons.

And while I can appreciate Erik's outrage, I see a problem here, too.

G!D, I hate anonymous bloggers!

So one anonymous blogger does something stupid, and all anonymous bloggers are tarred with it. Do you see a problem with that logic, Erik? Think about it. It'll come to you.

I'm gonna go play with the dog for a while. He makes more sense than most people.

Bookmark and Share

March 27, 2007

Quagmire Without an Occupation

| 7 Comments | No TrackBacks

From what Arundhati Roy has to say, it’s like the upper classes of India are in effect conducting a hostile occupation of everybody else. I’ve heard her and others talk very bitterly about the problems in India, and talk about the resistance movements needed, but this interview goes beyond that. It’s almost fatalistic. She seems resigned to the prospect of rebellion, pogroms, police massacres, India spiralling down into chaos. I find it quite frightening:

Unlike industrializing Western countries, which had colonies from which to plunder resources and generate slave labor to feed this process, we have to colonize ourselves, our own nether parts. We’ve begun to eat our own limbs. The greed that is being generated (and marketed as a value interchangeable with nationalism) can only be sated by grabbing land, water and resources from the vulnerable. What we’re witnessing is the most successful secessionist struggle ever waged in independent India — the secession of the middle and upper classes from the rest of the country.

So it’s outright war, and people on both sides are choosing their weapons.


Bookmark and Share

And I'm not going to snerk. Not. Not going to snerk.

I'm just going to report the news in a calm and dignified manner:

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is likely to face questions about the allegedly mediocre status of U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald when he arrives today for a scheduled round table discussion and press conference.

Gonzales is supposed to be at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse to discuss the "Project Safe Childhood" campaign designed to protect kids from online predators. But he's likely to be asked to field inquiries about Fitzgerald being ranked as undistinguished on a chart sent to the White House from the Justice Department in 2005, as well as the controversial fall firings of a group of U.S. attorneys.

Gonzales is to appear for a round table discussion of the project with Fitzgerald and Ernie Allen, President and CEO of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.

The mediocre rating has been the subject of much joking among prosecutors, federal agents, defense lawyers and the press in the city, and especially at the building where Fitzgerald has earned accolades for sweeping public corruption investigations.

Fitzgerald finally spoke out about the situation last week as his office was announcing yet another indictment against a one-time City Hall heavyweight.

After discussing the new charges against Al Sanchez, a former top aide to Mayor Richard Daley, Fitzgerald said he simply goes to work everyday concerned about doing his job. When he thinks about the rating, he said, it's only because a friend is teasing him about it again.

If you don't want to register to read the full report, go instead to firedoglake, where I first read the news (and you can just imagine the hilarity that has ensued over there).

Updates on those interesting White House emails that have been going through unauthorized channels:

CREW have been pressing this case for over a week now. Yesterday, House Oversight Committee chair Henry Waxman made his first move -- writing to both the Republican National Committee and the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign ...

... to retain copies of all e-mails sent or received by White House officials using e-mail accounts under their control, raising the political stakes in the congressional inquiry into U.S. attorneys' firings.

Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) said his broadly written request was based on evidence that White House officials -- particularly aides to top political adviser Karl Rove -- have used their politically related e-mail accounts to hide the conduct of official business regarding the prosecutor firings and other matters being investigated by Congress.

"The e-mails of White House officials maintained on RNC e-mail accounts may be relevant to multiple congressional investigations," Waxman wrote to the group's chairman, Mike Duncan, adding that as "governmental records" they are subject to preservation requirements and "eventual public disclosure."

And now, if you'll excuse me, I have an appointment with my Delete key.

Bookmark and Share

March 26, 2007

... but that didn't help. Full moon isn't till next Monday.

I'm goin' out to the garden to dig worms. I am seriously fed up.

And you'll all be really sorry, too. Only after I'm gone will you realize how sorry you are. But it'll be too late then, won't it.

Bookmark and Share

But seriously, folks

| 19 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Now that we're all through spanking Jason Cherniak — are we all through spanking him? — let's take another look at the issue.

First of all, to address the controversy in Quebec, when Marcel Blanchet made a last minute change to the rules to require devout Muslim women to lift their veils, he didn't do it because he was concerned about a conspiracy on the part of those women to commit fraud. Here's why he did it.

But Blanchet reversed his earlier decision Friday, saying it was necessary to avoid disruptions when residents go to the polls.

“Relevant articles to electoral laws were modified to add the following: any person showing up at a polling station must be uncovered to exercise the right to vote,” he said.

Blanchet had to get two bodyguards after the Quebec elections office received threatening phone calls and e-mails following his initial decision to allow niqabs. He said some residents had threatened to protest Monday’s vote by showing up at polling stations wearing masks.


The problem wasn't with Muslims, it was with a bunch of yahoos threatening to disrupt the election and threatening the physical safety of election officials. And as I understand it, he made the change on an emergency basis for this election only so the issue could be revisited when cooler heads would prevail.

Now does anyone doubt that one of the effects of this ruling will be to disenfranchise some Muslim women?


Bookmark and Share

Jason Cherniak has a post up in which he discusses doing actual research and concludes that the rumour he originally peddled now seems implausible and that he was wrong to repeat it. So noted. Credit him for that much.

Somehow this becomes proof that conclusions about policy he reached based on that rumour are still valid, but we'll leave that for another day.

Bookmark and Share

March 25, 2007

Rumours redux

| 15 Comments | No TrackBacks

Cherniak speaks!

Let's say, for argument's sake, that the ten or so NDP bloggers who are upset with me for mentioning the Trinity-Spadina rumour really believe that I have evil intent.

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the NDP or of the Blogger Dippers. There is nothing on this site that identifies it officially or unofficially as an NDP blog. So the dishonesty starts in the very first sentence. And it's obviously an attempt to spin the criticism as being based on partisanship instead of honestly held opinion. Which is about what I would expect.
Sorry, but I would not have posted this if I had not heard it from credible people.

Are you naming names? No? I call bullshit. If you're not willing to source the story then the best that can be said is that you have absolutely no standards as to what you publish. But you're the "new media consultant" so what the hell do I know, right?
The story is not that it happened (because I don't know whether it happened), but that reliable people believe it.

If "reliable people" believe that massive voter fraud took place in Trinity-Spadina why has there been no investigation?
If you don't want to believe that this is a real rumour, that is your choice. However, if you have any faith in my honesty ...

Do I really have to comment on this?
For the record, I never expected this sort of reaction.

You never do. You've repeatedly demonstrated that you like to play rough when it comes to people you don't approve of but you always express such wide-eyed wonder when you get called on it. It's already gotten old. But by all means, pick the shovel back up and dig yourself in even deeper.

Bookmark and Share

Nice catch, Erik

| 6 Comments | No TrackBacks

A tip of the hat to Getting It Right for picking up on an angle I'd missed in Jason Cherniak's post of yesterday. Cherniak actually claims that Liberals supported — "fought for" actually — changes to our electoral system based on nothing more than unsubstantiated rumour.

Congratulations, Jason. You've single-handedly made the Liberal party look like a bunch of idiots. I'm sure Stephane Dion will be pleased that the blogger who served as his Blog Campaign Co-Chair and is otherwise so heavily involved in the party has revealed that Liberals support policies based on nothing more than idle gossip.

Natural Governing Party, indeed.

Bookmark and Share

March 24, 2007

It's been 14 months since the last federal election and tonight is the first I've heard of this rather explosive accusation:

The rumour around TO (Let me be very clear; I am not suggesting that the rumour is true. I am only stating that it is out there.) is that Olivia Chow won because NDP supporters from across the city voted early and often at different polling stations in Trinity-Spadina.

I would have thought such a serious accusation would have surfaced before now if there was any substance to it at all. So is this really a rumour that's already going around? Or is it a rumour that Jason Cherniak pulled out of his ass and slipped into a post that was ostensibly about something else (qualified, of course, by his parenthetical assertion that he's not actually saying it's true)? Don't get me wrong. I'm not actually accusing Cherniak of making this up. I'm just, you know, asking questions. See the question marks?

Now let's revisit the opening of Jason's post, shall we?

Let's face it. People cheat in politics.

Some people, Jason. Some people will do any sleazy thing they can think of to gain political advantage. Rumour has it that some of them are Liberals.

Bookmark and Share

Where there's smoke ...

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

For some reason, I have the hardest time writing to stories I’ve been reading about in greatest depth. Why do we think that is? The Libby trial liveblogging left me next to speechless. And now the shocks and aftershocks of the U.S. federal prosecutors’ purge are having the same effect.

Not that I’m complaining, mind. If we’re now on Gonzales-watch, and we seem to be, then I’m happy to be drowning in document dumps from the U.S. Department of Justice (with occasional tasty copies of emails from the White House), since the DoJ met its match and then some last Monday night in the form of Josh Marshall and his readers at Talking Points Memo / TPMuckraker.

One of the most telling moments of last week’s drama slipped out in a White House press briefing on Wednesday, by which time everyone knew what the hive mind at TPM were accomplishing with the document dump and much else. Confronted with the history of his own and other administration cheerleaders’ positions on the limits of executive privilege, press secretary Tony Snow made the mistake of suddenly spitting out something sincere. “Is it making its way through the left-wing blogs?” snerked Tony.

Well, yes, Tony; it is. A lot of things are making their way through the left-wing blogs right now, and thanks for the notice. But you’re not bitter, are you, Tony?

The story continues to tumble out in rolling threads on TPM/TPMuckraker and the other American blogs that have the critical mass of informed volunteer commenters to make news or to take the news apart. In spurts the msm will skim off the latest significant discoveries – that U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has lied, and either lied or betrayed his office again and again. As many have observed in comments everywhere, Gonzales seems to have continued to behave as though he were the president’s private counsel rather than the attorney general of the United States.

Gonzales has done worse, of course.


Bookmark and Share

Good stuff in Ecuador

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks

So, people may be aware that there’s a new, leftish president in Ecuador, Rafael Correa. He seems to intend to head along a quite Chavez-like or Morales-like path, with a combination of popular involvement and local control of resources. But that’s easier said than done, of course. The political institutions of Ecuador are apparently known for corruption and rigging, and Correa has no real political party of his own. His first order of business for substantive transformation was to call a constituent assembly to put together a new constitution, which would lay out the rules for, among other things, seriously reformed political institutions. But with Congress largely opposing him, and indeed likely to be turfed from office under such new rules, it seemed unlikely he could pull it off. I didn’t really think he’d manage it. Surprisingly, he has!


Bookmark and Share

March 23, 2007

Friday night blues blogging

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

If you've been dropping by here recently then you've already enjoyed Otis Spann on the piano, first as a sideman for Muddy Waters and then sitting in with Sonny Boy Williamson. Here he is on centre stage.

Spann's Blues

Blues Don't Like Nobody


Bookmark and Share

March 21, 2007

I guess he heard me

| 27 Comments | 1 TrackBack

It wasn't that long ago that I encouraged Canada's New Prime Minister™ to keep taking cheap shots in the House of Commons. Like this one:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper went for the jugular again in question period today, accusing Liberal MPs of being more supportive of Taliban prisoners than of Canadian soldiers.

“I can understand the passion that the leader of the Opposition and members of his party feel for Taliban prisoners,” Harper said in the Commons. “I just wish occasionally they would show the same passion for Canadian soldiers.”


Attaboy, Steve. Keep demonstrating that no depth is too low to sink to if it involves an opportunity to score political points. Show Canadians that, deep down, you really are an arrogant jerk with nothing but contempt for anyone who isn't in lockstep with your ideology. Enough of this and hopefully you can kiss your majority goodbye.

Bookmark and Share

March 20, 2007

Quote of the day

| 11 Comments | No TrackBacks

There's quite a bit in the blogosphere this morning about yesterday's New Budget™. The closest anyone came to summing up my own reaction was two sentences at the end of this post by Paul Wells.

This budget is good politics and it will be welcomed by people who dislike Liberals because it will make it less likely that the Liberals get back into office. And if conservatism is only a dislike of Liberals, then there's no problem.

Pretty much. (Except that not all of us who have been unhappy with Liberals actually prefer the Harper Conservatives.)

Almost immediate update:

If you're looking for a good, meaty, fact-filled analysis you could do a lot worse than this from Relentlessly Progressive Economics. (Hat-tip to Robert at My Blahg.)

Bookmark and Share

March 19, 2007

So when does the attack on Iran happen?

| 17 Comments | No TrackBacks

I don't have much to say about this. It's just that after all the carrier movement and the demonizing and the Democrats maneuvering over whether to do something ineffectual to rein Bush in, I'm wondering when that shoe's gonna drop. I was expecting something might have happened by now.
D'you suppose the world got lucky and the Bushniks decided against it?

Bookmark and Share

March 17, 2007

Friday night blues blogging

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Sonny Boy Williamson. Keep It To Yourself.

And again with Otis Spann on piano. Nine Below Zero.

Bookmark and Share

March 16, 2007

I’m getting a bit of a jump on St Patrick’s Day because shortly I’m going to refer you to friend Melanie’s amazing Irish feast, which takes some forward planning of the shopping and the cooking and the preparing kinds.

But first: many people have recorded versions of this song, which is only right since it is one of those songs that belong to the people. This is how I like it sung best: “Carrickfergus,” Celtic melancholy perfect, from Tommy Makem:


“I’m drunk today, and I’m seldom so-oh-ber ...”

Sorry. I get carried away sometimes. I’m not Irish although I’m a cousin of a kind, and I understand why the Irish wince at some of what North Americans have perpetrated in the name of honouring their culture. Stage Irish, like stage Scots, got its start in London music halls over a century ago, but it took North Americans to think of things like ... green beer? “When Irish Eyes Are Smiling”? Ronald Reagan and Brian Mulroney singing “When Irish Eyes Are Smiling”? (There is a YouTube. Be grateful I’m not inflicting it on you.)

I also doubt that all their wars have felt very merry to the Irish, although they did perforce become good at fighting back against the dreaded Sassenachs (that’s Scots for the English). Chesterton’s famous verse about the great Gaels of Ireland rings truest in its last line. Their loveliest music has been ineffably sad, essence of longing for a place called home, the result no doubt of being driven so often from their homes by military or economic pressure -- and then as well of being driven from a home so beautiful.

Och, but I am sounding Celtic melancholic, amn't I. Food! Food will cheer us up. Like all country people, the Irish do food well because they still remember how to do it locally.


Bookmark and Share

March 13, 2007

Many of us are overjoyed to hear that our fellow citizen Kevin, his father Majid, and his mother Masomeh are soon to be freed from the Texas detention centre they were abducted to when their flight to Canada was forced down on American territory seven weeks ago. (The CTV report supplies the family’s surnames, which may not be wise.)

Many of us have also been inspired by the splendid tenacity of Annamarie at verbena-19, who has tracked this story from early February, kept in touch with the family, and organized letter-writing campaigns to the Canadian ministers responsible for the well-being of all Canadian citizens abroad. Praises are due also to liberal catnip, who worked with Annamarie from the beginning, and to GodammitKitty at Hope and Onions, who kept the blogburst rolling with her rolling accounting of the bursting blogs.

Catnip is probably right when she says that publication of this letter from Kevin to Stephen Harper in the Globe and Mail was decisive in convincing Canadian authorities to act in this case. But both Annamarie and catnip had been publishing the story earlier, and I think we can guess that they gave it the boost it needed to go mainstream.

So something very good has happened. And now, for the downside, aka the long term. (What? You expect me to be cheerful for long?)


Bookmark and Share

What’s good for Halliburton is good for . . . Dubai

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Too funny.

I for one am not going to fuss about Halliburton moving its corporate headquarters to Dubai on the sunny coast of the Persian Gulf. It makes sense, and it makes things so much clearer, too.

. . .

Remember the big brouhaha that arose when a Dubai-based company was in line to take over the operation of several major U.S. ports last year? Members of Congress were in high dudgeon over that and in the end the plan was abandoned.

So how do we feel knowing that virtually the entire supply line for our over-extended troops in Iraq and Afghanistan is now in the hands of a Dubai corporation, and that it has its hooks into the central policy arm of our government, Blair House and the Office of the Vice President?

Next time Halliburton's KBR subsidiary serves our troops toxic, bacteria-ridden food, or puts untreated Euphrates River water into their canteens, maybe we should look harder to see if this was just another case of corporate corner and cost-cutting, or whether something more sinister was at work.

Bookmark and Share

March 11, 2007

Brazil, Ethanol, and Agribusiness

| 12 Comments | No TrackBacks

I'm interested in environmental issues, interested in class issues, and interested in South America, so this article caught my eye rather. It's also nice to see something a little off the current beaten path for progressive writing--Bush and the Bushniks, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Kyoto, you know.

When I first saw talk about ethanol and for that matter biodiesel I thought, what a cool idea! Fuel made from a renewable source, grown on farms! Presumably, all the CO2 you produced by burning them would be sucked back out of the air next year when you grew the new crop. Great! But the more I've seen, the less I like them.


Bookmark and Share

March 10, 2007

skdadl is not my real name

| 24 Comments | No TrackBacks

I probably should have been up front about that when I first started blogging last year. I mean, I guess I knew back then that some people think real names are an issue, but I don’t think they’re an issue, and besides I’m the shy and retiring sort, so I didn’t think it would matter.

Some hack writing in one of our tackier national organs thinks that it matters, though, so I guess I’d better come clean. Confession is good for the soul and all that. (I don’t actually believe in confessing much, and I sure don’t believe in self-advertisement, aka showing off, but the cliché seemed handy.) So I confess: skdadl is not my real name, and I’m sorry I didn’t tell you sooner. I did tell pogge, and he didn’t seem to mind. But to anyone who now feels betrayed or misled, my heartfelt apologies and sincerest offer to make amends. I’m sorry, and now you know.

There now. Don’t we all feel better?

Oh, and swiftboating – did I mention swiftboating? “Viral marketing,” as friend kuri (which may not be her real name either) calls it. I don’t much believe in living down to behaviour that vile, although when I see good people being backed into corners unfairly, I start to take notes. Now, the hive mind (of the good kind) – I might believe in that. That sounds more like democracy to me. And I think I just might know a hive or two.

Bookmark and Share

March 9, 2007

Friday night blues blogging

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks

How about a pair from Muddy Waters?

Got My Mojo Workin'

And Hoochie Coochie Man


Bookmark and Share

March 7, 2007

Jury selection in the trial of Conrad Black began in Chicago on Monday:

Lord Black and three other former executives of Hollinger International Inc. face a variety of criminal charges over allegations they took more than $80-million (U.S.) from the Chicago-based newspaper company. They have pleaded not guilty and none of the allegations has been proven.

The trial is expected to last three months, involving dozens of witnesses and three million pages of documents.

Some of the reporters expected to cover the trial are celebrities in their own right, such as Dominick Dunne, who covers the rich and famous for Vanity Fair magazine and who is already chronicling the Black case for the monthly periodical.

A couple of Lord Black's biographers will also attend, including British author Tom Bower, whose recent book -- Conrad & Lady Black: Dancing on the Edge -- has provoked a libel suit from Lord Black, who alleges the text portrays him as "evil and devoid of any redeeming or even mitigating qualities."

And do read on: the Globe and Mail seems to be doing gossip so well these days.

“A variety of criminal charges”? It would fry some reporter’s computer to lay a few of those out for us in detail?

It pains me ever to pay a compliment to the National Post, but their reporter did lead by dropping a name that actually matters to this case: Patrick Fitzgerald:

The key to the Washington jury verdict for Mr. Fitzgerald, who personally prosecuted Mr. Libby, is the so-called "Kiss" principle -- Keep It Simple, Stupid.

"The basic rule for a white-collar prosecutor is not to get too complicated," explained Professor John Coffee at Columbia University Law School in New York.

"You really can't teach the average juror, who may not have finished high school, the equivalent of a graduate degree in accounting, during the course of a trial."

Although Mr. Fitzgerald will be on the sidelines supervising the case against Lord Black, expect his team of four assistant attorneys to play by the same principles. "The U.S. government has to simplify its case and focus on key events that can be explained simply," he said.

And the Post’s Theresa Tedesco does a much better job of laying out the charges and the competing strategies of prosecution and defence to watch for:


Bookmark and Share

March 6, 2007

The verdict in the trial of Scooter Libby will be read at noon EST. You can follow the liveblogging, as always, at firedoglake.com.

Update: For the time being, I'll just keep adding links to good analyses and reflections in comments below.

Bookmark and Share

March 3, 2007

Doris Anderson 1921-2007

| 5 Comments | No TrackBacks

Once heard or read, never forgotten. That voice -- measured, steady, powerfully persistent, kindly and yet devastatingly frank -- was unlike anything most young women had ever heard in Canada in the 1950s or 1960s.

If ever any editor or publisher in this country earned the epithet "legendary," it was Doris Anderson, who died yesterday in Toronto at the age of eighty-five. Among the (still too few) women who have broken through glass ceilings to become power-brokers on their own, Anderson was unique. She was obviously propelled by an unshakeable faith in the dignity and competence of women, grounded in her own sense of self-esteem, but she ran as well on just the right level of piss and vinegar to wake up some of the boys in the backrooms and to give heart to a lot of women who hadn't yet found the kind of courage she had.

Sandra Martin's fine obit in yesterday's Globe and Mail tells such a story. Many people will remember Anderson best as the editor who turned a women's magazine into a journalistic powerhouse in the fifties, sixties, and seventies:

As editor of Chatelaine, Ms. Anderson wanted to give readers what they expected in the way of recipes, beauty and parenting tips, but she also wanted to give them “something serious to think about” and to “shake them up a bit” with well-written, hard-hitting investigative pieces on abortion, birth control, discriminatory divorce laws and the wage gap.

And she hired excellent journalists to write them, including June Callwood, Christina McCall (later Newman) Michele Landsberg, Barbara Frum and Sylvia Fraser. “I had fabulous women,” she said later, explaining that many of them came to her because they couldn't find places to write elsewhere.

One of her first editorials was an appeal for more women in Parliament -- there were only two female MPs in 1958 --another early one was for reform of the draconian abortion laws. She quickly learned that effecting social change meant frequently revisiting issues in editorials and articles and so she devoted lots of space over the years to push for a Royal Commission on the status of women, and to expose horrors such as child battering, racism and the plight of Canada's Native peoples. Some readers felt that she was turning "a nice wholesome Canadian magazine into a feminist rag." However, circulation, which was 480,000 when she became editor, had increased by the late 1960s to 1.8 million readers, the equivalent of one out of every three women in Canada.

[My emphasis. Gee: how the world hasn't changed.]

Anderson walked away from the flaccid boy-publishers, though, when she realized that they were never going to give her an even break, no matter how successful she was. She charged into politics, and then she charged into making our Charter a serious declaration of human rights and freedoms.


Bookmark and Share

March 2, 2007

Friday night blues blogging

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

We're unplugged this evening.

Corey Harris. Honeysuckle.

And Corey Harris with Keb' Mo'. Sweet Home Chicago.


Bookmark and Share

Chavez Sidelining the IMF in Latin America

| 17 Comments | No TrackBacks

It’s interesting in general how greatly IMF influence has waned over the last few years. I don’t really understand it, although there are a few pointers. The news seems to have generally gotten around after the Asian meltdown and events like the Argentina troubles that IMF funding is a cure worse than the disease—not only for the countries involved, but often for the politicians leading those countries. And I’ve gotten the impression that there’s an awful lot of investment money splashing around these days, so countries haven’t had to go to the “lender of last resort” because there are plenty of other lenders.

But it seems that nowhere has the IMF’s influence disappeared so entirely as in Latin America, in good part because Hugo Chavez has been using oil money to buy bonds and otherwise lend (at much lower interest rates than the IMF from what I’ve heard) to countries in the region, allowing them to pay off IMF debt, substituting lower-interest debt to Venezuela. The effect has been dramatic, according to this article:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is squeezing the International Monetary Fund out of Latin America, the region that once accounted for most of its business. IMF lending in the area has fallen to $50 million, or less than 1 percent of its global portfolio, compared with 80 percent in 2005. Meanwhile, Chavez has used his oil wealth to lend $2.5 billion to Argentina, offer $1.5 billion to Bolivia and hold $500 million out to Ecuador.

Bookmark and Share

Contributors

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from March 2007 listed from newest to oldest.

February 2007 is the previous archive.

April 2007 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Tag Cloud

Blogging Change

Progressive Bloggers

      Canadian Blogosphere  

      Blogging Canadians  

NO Deep integration!



Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en

Hosted by BlackSun