Flu news: Canadian edition

| 8 Comments | No TrackBacks

If you're a regular reader at Just a Bump in the Beltway, you'll know that Melanie and Charles have been closely watching the avian flu story and the possibility that the bug responsible, H5N1, could mutate into a form that could pass from human to human and lead to a global pandemic with devastating consequences.

Yesterday Melanie pointed to a Denver Post story with the comment: "The US press finally wakes up."

Fearing an outbreak of a new flu strain capable of killing millions, the nation's public health agency is quietly preparing a plan that proposes quarantines, school closures and rationing vaccine to counteract an epidemic.
...
Even as they plan, health officials worry those steps won't halt a deadly bird flu if it mutates and starts spreading among people. An outbreak of avian flu in humans - if it happens - would kill millions worldwide.

Scientists say it's not a question of if but rather when a flu that people lack immunity to emerges, triggering a pandemic. A mild form of avian flu has already spread among a small group of people in Europe.
...
Avian flu, which plagues birds in Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Pakistan, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam, lacks the ability to spread from person to person. Of the 37 deaths that have occurred worldwide, most of those who died had direct contact with infected birds.

But influenza viruses mutate constantly, which is why people need vaccines each year to fend off the latest strain. The longer that avian flu persists in birds, the greater the likelihood it will mutate into a form that is contagious among people.

If that happens, "then you have a virus that essentially the vast majority of people have no protection against, but it transmits well in humans," said Lynette Brammer, an epidemiologist at the CDC in Atlanta. "That's when you get a pandemic."


As if on cue, there are a couple of stories in the Canadian media today on the same subject. At CTV, there's a Canadian Press story that reports on a debate among flu experts over the possibility of stopping a pandemic in its tracks.
With a rising death toll in Vietnam and almost daily warnings that an influenza pandemic is imminent, a number of flu experts are wondering whether a pandemic could be averted with swift and decisive action.

A stockpile of anti-viral drugs deployed in Southeast Asian countries battling outbreaks of the deadly avian flu might temporarily stall or even stop a pandemic, two experts hypothesize in this week's New England Journal of Medicine.

Their articles were released ahead of schedule Monday to coincide with a conference on pandemic influenza organized by the University of Michigan's Bioterrorism Preparedness Initiative.

The director of the World Health Organization's global influenza program mused that if the H5N1 virus experts fear is poised to trigger a pandemic only gradually acquires the genetic changes needed to easily spread from person to person, an unprecedented effort to stop a pandemic might bear fruit.

"Though it is an attractive option, no attempt has ever been made to interrupt the transmission of an influenza virus; the results of such an enormous and costly undertaking remain uncertain,'' Dr. Klaus Stohr acknowledged.

"The option deserves further investigation, however, particularly when viewed against the profound effect a delay in global spread and a flattening of the peak in disease prevalence could have during the initial phase of a pandemic.''

But a leading U.S. epidemiologist suggested the idea was unworkable. Dr. Michael Osterholm said there are neither enough anti-viral drugs available globally nor a way to quickly find all possible cases of human-to-human transmission and get drugs to their close contacts -- and there isn't time to find solutions to those problems.


Meanwhile the Toronto Star reports on a company that claims it can quadruple the production of flu vaccine.
A Canadian biotech company could be about to spark what the head of the WHO's influenza program says may be a mini-revolution in the manufacture of flu vaccine.

Microbix Biosystems Inc., a Toronto company, has developed a mysterious "process" it claims produces a four-fold increase in the yield of influenza virus incubated in eggs. It recently announced it's in negotiations with a major player in the flu vaccine world for an exclusive licence to the process.

It's not uncommon for the biotech field to make extravagant claims that never come to pass. Still, this one has some global flu experts watching closely.

They see the Microbix process ? if it pans out ? as a possible partial solution to what will be a massive global vaccine shortage when the next flu pandemic hits.


But there's a fly in the ointment and it raises an issue that needs looking at, especially in light of the potential consequences of something as deadly as avian flu.
But the proposed exclusive licensing deal with the potential buyer worries some experts concerned about the inadequacy of the global vaccine production in the face of a looming influenza pandemic.

"Exclusive licensing of a technology like this is simply not in keeping with the interests of global public health," says flu vaccine specialist Dr. David Fedson.

"Assuming that this is something that can either be synthesized simply or is naturally available in what are, in effect, limitless quantities ... then the needs of public health really demand that it be made available to every vaccine company that's interested," says Fedson, a retired executive of vaccine giant Aventis (now Sanofi) Pasteur.

"And for those vaccine companies that aren't interested, their national governments should come around in the middle of the night and persuade them ? make them an offer they can't refuse ? to get interested in this and test it."


As the article reports, there's still a great deal of mystery surrounding the "process". But with the media starting to pay attention to this, I suspect we'll be hearing more in the near future.

Bookmark and Share                                

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.pogge.ca/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/682

8 Comments

pogge,

I haven't looked at the Star story yet, but I suspect the drug maker is blowing smoke. One of the reasons we don't have a vaccine for this bug yet is that it is so pathogenic that it kills the eggs used for traditional vaccine making. There are three labs that are currently trying to use reverse gene modeling to try to make a vaccine, which is much more difficult than the egg incubation method.

And, pogge, the Canadian press have been doing a much better job of covering this story than the US press. Seems like you might have learned something about epidemiology from SARS and Mad Cow, eh?

The Globe and Mail today reported on an investigation, described yesterday in the New England Journal of Medicine, of what appears to be the first case of person-to-person transmission of the avian flu virus.

An eleven-year-old Thai girl is believed to have contracted the disease from infected chickens and then passed it on to both her mother and her aunt. The girl and her mother have died; the aunt is recovering.

The authors of the study note, however, that autopsy samples suggest that the virus has not undergone the changes (sharing of genetic material with a human virus) that would allow it to spread among humans.

Which seems a puzzling conclusion, but that's where we were left, more or less.

skdadl,

Chances are that the Thai case is not "patient zero" and that the first case of human-human transmission took place in the backwoods last year. Here's what makes the G&M story confusing: one of the things these virii do is reassort genes for efficient transmission. As of right now, it can be passed around but it still is fairly hard to get. What the WHO is monitoring for now is genetic reassortment for ease of transmission.

I can see that, melanie, although I don't fully grasp what the middle stage of reassortment would be -- or maybe it is a mistake to think of a "middle stage," maybe wiser to think of a continuing devolution.

My parents both had relatives who went under in the epidemic right after the Great War. I had always thought of that as a threat so far removed from us, preserved back there in history as if in amber. But then, I thought that antibiotics would always work against strep infections, and tuberculosis (which killed my grandmother at 33) was gone too. I think we call this hubris.

skdadl,

TB is making a big comeback in drug resistant form. We are entering the era of the superbug.

I have a friend who had a urinary tract infection recently. It took three courses of Cipro to cure it. Cipro! UTIs used to be easily treatable with streptomycin and cipro was used for life threatening respiratory infections.

I'm given to understand that antibiotic research slowed down for a long time.

I had a UTI last year, and the Dr gave me sample packs of Cipro so I didn't have to go to the pharmacy. I didn't think Cipro would be necessary (no immediate reason that my UTI would be drug resistant) but here in the US that is what they give out. Start with strong antibiotics - that way we get more drug resistant bugs. Long live the super bug.

Contributors

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by pogge published on January 24, 2005 11:27 AM.

RIP Johnny Carson was the previous entry in this blog.

Another county heard from is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Tag Cloud

Blogging Change

Progressive Bloggers

      Canadian Blogosphere  

      Blogging Canadians  

NO Deep integration!



Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en

Hosted by BlackSun