Has anyone told the Iraqis?

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

It's entirely possible that the Coalition Provisional Authority, the entity currently in charge of Iraq, doesn't actually exist. From Slate:

...what, bureaucratically speaking, is the CPA? A new report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, posted online by the good-government folks at the Federation of American Scientists says, "It is unclear whether CPA is a federal agency." Noting that its "organizational status is uncertain," the report speculates that the CPA may be a part of the Pentagon (the Army cuts Bremer's checks), it may be a stand-alone executive agency, or it may be an international institution, like NATO.

The confusion?which, the report notes, raises questions about "whether, and to what extent, CPA might be held accountable for its programs, activities, decisions, and expenditures"?stems from the White House, which hasn't released information delineating the CPA's authority, structure, or place in government. (It also didn't return calls seeking clarification.) The best information congressional researchers could find on the CPA's structure was "an undated organization chart" that "provides some insight into the structure of the authority, although it does not include some key offices and positions."

In last fall's $87 billion war and reconstruction bill, Congress described the CPA as an "entity of the United States Government." Presidential memorandums reiterate that view. But the U.S. Army has a slightly different take: Its legal office said the "CPA is not a federal agency. Like NATO, CPA is composed of [an] international coalition."

The uncertainty goes back to the CPA's birth, which seems to have happened via immaculate conception. The White House doesn't appear to have announced it. References to the CPA just started showing up in government documents. The congressional researchers write, "[N]o explicit, unambiguous, and authoritative statement has been provided that declares how the authority was established, under what authority, and by whom."

The report posits "two alternative explanations for how the CPA was established." One is that Bush may have created the CPA via a presidential directive. The researchers caution, "This document, if it exists, has not been made available to the public." The other explanation, suggested by the Army and others, is that the CPA was created by a U.N. Security Council resolution. However, as the congressional sleuths point out, while the resolution does recognize the United States and Britain as "occupying powers," it "does not establish, or authorize the creation of, a specific organization to carry out this responsibility."


Via digby at Hullabaloo who asks:
By the way, when exactly did the Congress of the United States close up shop, anyway?

Maybe Congress never actually existed either.

Bookmark and Share                                

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.pogge.ca/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/401

2 Comments

Isn't Slate the site that displays Ted Rall's loathsome cartoons?

It may be. I don't go looking for Rall's work. Some of it is, as you say, loathsome.

Contributors

Tip Jar


Total donations to date: $115.00

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by pogge published on May 4, 2004 8:14 PM.

Department of foot in mouth III was the previous entry in this blog.

Quote of the day is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogging Change

Progressive Bloggers

      Canadian Blogosphere  

      Blogging Canadians  

NO Deep integration!

Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.37