Peace, order and good government, eh?

I remarked recently that I felt our government was overly optimistic in its economic forecasts and didn't seem to be considering the possibility that something might yet cause the recovery we're all supposed to be experiencing to stall. Perhaps someone should ask Jim Flaherty what he thinks about this from the Washington Post.

The housing market is facing swelling ranks of homeowners who are seriously delinquent but have yet to lose their homes, and this is threatening a new wave of foreclosures that could hit just as the real estate market has begun to stabilize.

About 5 million to 7 million properties are potentially eligible for foreclosure but have not yet been repossessed and put up for sale. Some economists project it could take nearly three years before all these homes have been put on the market and purchased by new owners. And the number of pending foreclosures could grow much bigger over the coming year as more distressed borrowers become delinquent and then, if they can't obtain mortgage relief, wade through the foreclosure process, which often takes more than a year to complete.

Is it just me, or has Flaherty been talking as if he's either completely unaware of this or thinks that our own economy will be completely immune to a problem like this involving our largest trading partner?

H/t Atrios.

As the Conservatives prepare to re-introduce their law and order agenda, let us bear in mind that the original War on (Some) Drugs™ was a creation of the Reagan administration in the United States. Michelle Alexander in The Nation:

President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising. From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican Party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by, desegregation, busing, and affirmative action. In the words of H.R. Haldeman, President Richard Nixon's White House chief of staff: "[T]he whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to."

Any number of people have argued — correctly — that the policies Conservatives propose have already been proven failures if the goal is really to reduce crime. That argument doesn't gain any traction with Conservatives because that isn't the goal. The situations in the two countries may not be directly comparable but this is still all about politics.

H/t John Ballard at Newshoggers.

Edited slightly for clarity.

Thomas Walkom on the government's proposal to have a third party review the documents pertaining to the Afghan detainee file:

Politically, Ottawa's decision to hand off the Afghan prisoner scandal to retired Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci serves both Stephen Harper's Conservatives and Michael Ignatieff's Liberals.

Constitutionally, however, it is a disaster. It flies in the face of the bedrock Canadian principle that cabinet is responsible to Parliament and that a government - any government - must accede to the wishes of a majority of elected MPs.

What, exactly, is the opposition waiting for?

We don't usually do Disney here. (I've actually tried to make a minor career out of dissing Disney every chance I get, and I'm moderately disappointed that they haven't yet sent fearsome lawyers out after me.)

But it is so true. Nothing says love like spaghetti. I love you: I feed you spaghetti.

Twenty-five years ago tonight, he made me spaghetti. And then it was pretty much like this.

Bernie Farber, the CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress, has a letter published in the Toronto Star in reaction to a Thomas Walkom column. This is how it's done, folks.

To falsely accuse Israel, and by extension the vast majority of the world's Jews who support the Jewish state, of "apartheid," is a form of anti-Semitic bullying.

Notice how easily he manages to imply that "the vast majority of the world's Jews" are in full support of not just the existence of Israel but everything the Israeli government does, including its treatment of Palestinians. Hand in hand with this is the implication that a criticism of the actions of the state of Israel is somehow aimed at "the vast majority of the world's Jews" which is how Farber and his fellow sophists make the leap to claiming that criticism of Israel is anti-semitism. All this in a single sentence. He's good, I'll grant him that.

Of course the people responsible for the policies of the state of Israel are those who govern Israel, whether they're Jewish or not. If I criticize those policies, I'm not criticizing the Jews who may live in my neighbourhood. For all I know, some of them may feel that Israel is practicing apartheid. In fact, there is reason to believe that some of them do since there are Jewish organizations in Canada that support Israeli Apartheid Week and the BDS movement.

The Yes! is in agreement with the Rev posting at both his own site and the Beav:

If the allegation that Afghan prisoners were purposely sent to be tortured turns out to be true, I want people sent to jail. And by jail I don't mean country club Conrad Black minimum security jail, either. I want to see them walking the yard at Millhaven. And by people I mean every single person in the chain of command that approved or did not act to stop this - right up to the Cabinet level, including the Prime Minister. If it happened under the Liberals and Paul Martin knew about it, fine, jail his retired ass, too.

And if an "arms length" inquiry, as Kevin suggests, is the right way to do it, fine. But the moment a majority of MPs in the House of Commons voted to demand the release of unredacted documents to the special committee on Afghanistan and the government refused, it raised a separate issue. The government is in contempt of parliament. If a minority government can simply shrug off the will of a majority in the Commons then our democracy is broken (even more than we already thought) and the opposition is failing in a fundamental way to do its job. Compromises involving third parties, whether it's a single retired judge reviewing documents or a full blown public inquiry, doesn't change that.

You'd think there would be one among all those opposition MPs who's prepared to argue out loud that even if voters don't currently see the importance of this, it's necessary to gamble that they can be convinced if it comes to that.

Irrational joy breaks out across a country that is really pretty big, as the Arrogant Worms sing, all things considered.

This is simply the most beautiful Canadian spring I've ever seen, and I'm not young.

I'll probably have to eat my words about the weather in a week or so, this being Canada. And we are facing some horrible moral challenges in the hints and leaks we're getting about our special ops (JTF2) transfer of Afghan prisoners to the U.S. black sites at Bagram and Kandahar.

I don't know how we calm our souls with argument when we know that such horrible things have been done in our name.

So that's why we play music, and why we wander out into the sunshine with an aging cat who needs a last chance to feel and smell the grass and soil beneath her feet.

Happy spring to you all.

George Harrison, "Here Comes the Sun"

Mississippi Fred McDowell once firmly declared "I do not play no rock and roll." Here he is, not playing rock and roll. This is Goin' Down to the River.

The Conservative government must respect the supremacy of Parliament. When they get around to it. If it's not too much trouble.

I've paid a bit more attention to today's budget than to yesterday's throne speech because budgets actually do lead to legislation, though I always try to bear in mind that our Minister of Finance has only a passing familiarity with arithmetic and an even shakier relationship with the truth. What I take from the reporting I've read is that the Conservatives aren't anxious to go to the polls right now. When you put aside the political posturing they've given us a corporate-friendly budget which makes it awkward for the Liberals to oppose it unless there's something really provocative in there. And I don't see it.

When you combine that with the conciliatory noises the Liberals have made about negotiating a solution to the standoff on the Afghan detainee file, I'm guessing that the Conservatives will be off the hook on the most potentially damaging issue they face and there won't be an election until the fall. And if the Conservatives haven't gotten their mojo back in the polls, not even then.

And I agree with the prominence The Jurist gives to this point: aside from his other failings Flaherty buys into the spin that the worst of the recent economic unpleasantness is over and we're in recovery. So he's conducting himself accordingly despite the fact that in the U.S. — the trading partner whose demand drives a big chunk of our economy — the foreclosure crisis is far from over, unemployment levels remain dangerously high and precisely nothing has been done thus far to address the fundamental causes of the recent near-collapse of the global financial system. The American economy is still being run for the benefit of the banksters and their cronies first, and everyone else second.

I don't see much to be optimistic about.

Fallujah doctors report rise in birth defects

Doctors in the Iraqi city of Fallujah are reporting a high level of birth defects, with some blaming weapons used by the US after the Iraq invasion.

The city witnessed fierce fighting in 2004 as US forces carried out a major offensive against insurgents.

Now, the level of heart defects among newborn babies is said to be 13 times higher than in Europe.

There's a companion story, also from the BBC, that reports that after the shooting was over in Fallujah the rubble was bulldozed into a bank of a river that supplies a lot of residents with drinking water.

It would seem to me that the obvious words to mention in this story are "depleted" and "uranium" but neither word appears. Given the history of claims that DU can cause these kinds of problems, I find that more than a little puzzling. There is no other specific cause mentioned — - just suspicion about "weapons." Isn't much of the DU that's used by the United States supplied by Canada?

H/t to lagatta at Bread and Roses.

Almost immediate update:

And immediately after posting this I found a much meatier post on it by Jim White at The Seminal. He definitely mentions depleted uranium. He has videos. And charts!

'Time to talk' to Afghan Taliban: UN envoy

KABUL, Afghanistan -- The head of the UN mission in Afghanistan said Thursday that it's "high time" a political solution is found with the Taliban to resolve the more than 8-year-old conflict.

"It's time to talk," Kai Eide said.

Isn't this the attitude that had politicians and pundits across the country sneering at "Taliban Jack" and questioning his patriotism?

I hear there's a big speech planned for later today. Since I think this government is both thoroughly dishonest and completely indifferent to charges of hypocrisy when they say one thing and do another, I don't see any point in trying to parse either the advance leaks or the speech itself. With this group, even their own legislation doesn't necessarily signal their true intentions since they're as likely as not to get something passed with great fanfare and then fail to implement it. I'll try and tune back in when stuff actually happens.

Meanwhile, feel free to talk amongst yourselves as long you confine yourselves to what would be considered legitimate criticism. (No, I'm not letting up on that yet. Why do you ask?)

Immigration Minister pulled gay rights from citizenship guide, documents show

Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney blocked any reference to gay rights in a new study guide for immigrants applying for Canadian citizenship, The Canadian Press has learned.

Internal documents show an early draft of the guide contained sections noting that homosexuality was decriminalized in 1969; that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation; and that same-sex marriage was legalized nationally in 2005.

But Mr. Kenney, who fought same-sex marriage when it was debated in Parliament, ordered those key sections removed when his office sent its comments to the department last June.

There's much more at the link. You'll find that it wasn't just specific mentions of same-sex marriage that Kenney had removed. It was any reference at all to equality for gays. This from a guy who boasts about standing up for what he likes to call "Canadian values."

And let's have another cheer for the Access to Information legislation.

Please note that this post is still to be reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Legitimate Criticism. It may not last.